For UK companies chasing public funding

The grant you should be winning
is already in here.

Q: Which UK grants does GrantSpark track?

GrantSpark syncs every live opportunity from GOV.UK Find a Grant and UKRI's Funding Finder daily — Innovate UK competitions, research council calls, Defra programmes, and hundreds more, with award ranges, deadlines, and eligibility.

Q: Does the AI just generate generic text?

No — before drafting any section, GrantSpark interviews you: 3–5 sharp questions about the figures, partners, and evidence only you know, often citing the funder's own scored questions. Your answers become the backbone of the draft, and anything you skip is marked with a placeholder rather than invented.

Q: Can my team work on an application together?

Yes. Applications support real-time collaborative editing with live cursors, team roles (owner, editor, viewer), shared company evidence, and per-application project teams with hour allocation.

Q: How does the AI review work?

GrantSpark assesses your draft against an assessor-style rubric — adapting to the funder's own scored criteria when their guidance defines them — flags hard blockers like eligibility failures, and proposes concrete rewrites for the weakest sections that you accept or dismiss.

GrantSpark tracks every live UK grant, scores each one against your company, and helps you write the application — grounded in your evidence, checked against the funder's own criteria.

Get started free See how it works

244 live grants · GOV.UK Find a Grant + UKRI · synced daily

The GrantSpark dashboard: application pipeline with deadlines and next actions, and AI-scored grant matches

Three minutes to your shortlist

No forms marathon. GrantSpark builds your company profile from your own website.

Point it at your website

AI reads your site — products, track record, mission — and turns it into the evidence base every application draws on.

See your matches

Every open UK grant gets a 0–100 fit score with a one-line rationale. The calls worth your time surface; the rest stay out of your way.

Start writing

Pick a grant and GrantSpark mirrors the funder's real application form, imports their guidance documents, and drafts with you.

Discovery & matching

Every open UK grant, scored against your company

Stop skimming listings. GrantSpark syncs GOV.UK Find a Grant and UKRI daily, then scores every open call against your profile — with an honest rationale for each score, including the reasons a grant is not for you.

Drafting that interviews you first

Generic AI text loses bids. Before writing a section, GrantSpark asks you 3–5 sharp questions — the market sizes, named partners, and evidence only you know, often citing the funder's own scored questions. Your answers become the backbone of the draft; anything you skip gets an honest [placeholder], never an invented fact.

A funder's-eye review before the funder sees it

Send your draft for review and GrantSpark scores it like an assessor — against the funder's own criteria when their guidance defines them. Hard blockers get named, weak sections get concrete rewrites you accept or dismiss, and the score updates every time you improve.

The delivery plan funders expect

Work packages, tasks, and milestones on an interactive Gantt speaking project months (M1–M18) the way bids do — with per-package costs by funder category, person-months, and staff hour allocation. AI drafts the plan from your application; you drag it into shape.

Ship it when it's actually ready

Real-time collaborative editing with your team, then a pre-flight checklist that counts every leftover [placeholder], flags over-limit sections and review blockers, and only offers "Mark as submitted" when the application would survive an assessor's first pass. Export to Word or Markdown, plan included.

"Can't I just use a chatbot?"

You can — plenty of teams paste sections into a general AI assistant. The gap isn't the writing; it's everything the writing depends on.

	A generic AI chatbot	GrantSpark
Knowing what's open	No live data — you find the calls yourself	Every live UK call synced daily and scored against your company
The funder's rules	Only what you remember to paste in	Guidance documents auto-imported and read for every draft and review
Your evidence	Retyped into every prompt, drifts between sessions	A durable company profile and document base every feature draws on
Missing facts	Filled with plausible-sounding inventions	Marked as honest [placeholders] — the interview asks you for the real ones
Quality check	You're the only reviewer	Assessor-style review scored against the funder's own criteria
The delivery plan	A text outline at best	Costed work packages, Gantt, milestones and staff hours — exported with the bid
Team workflow	Copy-paste between people	Real-time collaborative editing, roles, and a submission readiness check

Built for the people who actually write bids

Grant work lands on someone's desk on top of their real job. GrantSpark is shaped around three of those desks.

Founders & leadership

You know the business cold but not the funding landscape.

The scan builds your profile from your website, matches surface only the calls worth your time, and the fit check tells you honestly when not to bother — before you spend a weekend on a lost cause.

R&D and technical leads

You can explain the innovation; turning it into scored answers is the grind.

The pre-draft interview asks the questions assessors care about, drafts are grounded in your documents, and the project plan turns your roadmap into work packages, costs and milestones funders can mark.

Bid writers & teams

You run several applications at once and the risk is what slips between them.

The pipeline view keeps every application's next action and deadline in one place, collaborative editing keeps everyone in the same draft, and the readiness check catches placeholders and blockers before submission.

AI drafts. You decide.

Funders are rightly wary of generated slop — so GrantSpark is built to keep you, and your evidence, in charge.

No invented facts

Anything the AI doesn't know becomes a visible [placeholder], never a plausible fabrication. The readiness check counts every one before you can mark a bid submitted.

Every change is yours

Review suggestions are proposals — you see the rationale, compare versions, and accept or dismiss. Nothing rewrites itself.

Your data stays yours

Your content is never used to train models and never sold. Hosted in the EU; only what a feature needs is sent to the AI.

No success fees

GrantSpark is software, not a consultancy — we never take a percentage of funding you win.

Questions, answered

Which UK grants does GrantSpark track? +

Every live opportunity on GOV.UK Find a Grant and UKRI's Funding Finder, synced daily — Innovate UK competitions, research council calls, Defra programmes, and hundreds more, with award ranges, deadlines, and eligibility.

How does the AI matching work? +

You describe your company once (or let GrantSpark read your website). Every open grant is scored 0–100 against your profile with a one-line rationale — including honest reasons a grant is not for you.

Does the AI just generate generic text? +

No. Before drafting a section, GrantSpark interviews you: 3–5 sharp questions about the figures, partners, and evidence only you know. Your answers become the draft's backbone; skipped questions get [placeholders], never invented facts.

Can my team work on an application together? +

Yes — real-time collaborative editing with live cursors, roles (owner, editor, viewer), shared company evidence, and per-application project teams with hour allocation.

How does the AI review work? +

Your draft is scored like an assessor would — against the funder's own criteria when their guidance defines them. Blockers are named, weak sections get concrete rewrites to accept or dismiss.

What does exporting look like? +

One click produces a formatted Word document or Markdown file — every section plus your delivery plan with costs, milestones, and a month-grid timeline — ready for the funder's portal.

The grant you should be winning
is already in here.